HM has no AI and must not compile/test/judge code correctness — that was an
overreach. Reframed §6: HM only relays AM execution status + the FACT of
whether an artifact exists (anti-empty-shell), never a quality/correctness
verdict. The desktop client (Claude-Code-like) pulls the code/git, runs and
tests it, and the user reviews — that is where "is it correct/valid/what I
wanted" is decided. AM test results are a test_report artifact for the client
to read, NOT a signal fed to HM for judging.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
chenchenandClaude Opus 4.8
6f76162126