Close the remaining coverage gaps in the client-facing API doc (verified against
real routes in router/api-router.go):
- §2.1 NEW "sub 可用性就绪闸门": the 4-gate composite the client must pass before
enabling sub (capabilities.enabled + device-bound + active git binding + balance),
with pseudo-code and per-gate data source — directly answers "客户端判断 sub 是否可用".
- §2.2 NEW account/balance: GET /api/user/self (+/self/groups,/self/models),
quota/used_quota/request_count, model intersection rule.
- §2 capabilities: documented every field (runtime_kind/model_selection/supports_*).
- §4.2 NEW run-info interfaces with response shapes: logs(user/debug),
timeline(events incl delivery.pushed), events, metrics, diagnostics, sk-snapshots.
- §12 NEW full endpoint inventory by flow stage (①startup ②create ③monitor
④approve ⑤artifacts ⑥iterate ⑦deploy ⑧resources) with 🟢/🟡/🔴 status — a
coverage checklist mapping every real route so nothing is silently missing.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per the locked-in model: sub mode requires git binding; the final deliverable
exists ONLY in the user's own git repo (clone/pull). During a run HM streams
ONLY run-info (logs, status, work-view). There is no product download —
project_folder / manifest / files / archive(zip) / local-edits-revision are all
retired across both docs.
- spec: header note, sequence diagram, §2 contract table (code product = git_ref),
§3.0 step13, §3.1 (mandatory git), §3.5/§3.6 (git-only view), §3.7 (git is the
iterate baseline, no local-edits), §6.4 (deliverable check on git_ref, not files),
§7 / §8#8 / §10 TODO aligned. HM "artifact" demoted to a delivery/run-info record.
- unified-api: §3 parity note + legacy error codes marked retired (prior commit
already reworked §5/§6).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
sub mode requires git binding (else local-only), so the code deliverable
lives solely in the user's own git repo (clone/pull). Demote the legacy
"HM parses text artifact into project_folder (manifest/files/archive)" and
the local-edits revision flow to legacy/back-compat: §5 now = code via git +
artifacts only for non-code (test_report/summary); §6 redirects to git.
Backend endpoints remain for back-compat but new integrations must not use them.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The client API doc still carried the old flow; aligned it to
heicode-sub-mode-flow-spec.md (which it now references as the authority):
- Top banner: client is Claude-Code-like agentic; HM is the model gateway +
control plane (no AI/exec); AM is the cloud runtime; sub = offload to cloud.
- display_status reframed: HM judges presence/anti-empty-shell, NOT code
correctness; correctness = client (runs/tests) + user review (§0, §4).
- Deploy (§7) rewritten: client-executed + mandatory user confirmation; HM only
hands the credential from Key Vault; the old Manager-side Deploy-Worker model
is marked deprecated (also in §0.1 flow + §3 route table).
- New §8 Resource binding (git/vm/db/blob -> KV) with the /api/resources API and
the pending V2 client-facing read/credential endpoints.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
HM has no AI and must not compile/test/judge code correctness — that was an
overreach. Reframed §6: HM only relays AM execution status + the FACT of
whether an artifact exists (anti-empty-shell), never a quality/correctness
verdict. The desktop client (Claude-Code-like) pulls the code/git, runs and
tests it, and the user reviews — that is where "is it correct/valid/what I
wanted" is decided. AM test results are a test_report artifact for the client
to read, NOT a signal fed to HM for judging.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Answer "how does HM know AM output is real/valid": honestly, it does not — HM
has no AI and never reads/runs code. It only checks structural signals
(non-fallback, non-summary, delivery-type artifact with file changes), which
rules out fake/empty completions but does NOT guarantee correctness and can be
gamed by AM mislabeling. To upgrade "has something" to "really valid" needs:
(1) AM reports a verification block (build/tests/lint) that HM folds into the
verdict, (2) acceptance_criteria self-check, (3) final user review. Added the
verification block to the AM TODO as the key missing signal.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Re-examined the whole spec under the corrected model (client = Claude-Code-
like agentic program, not a shell):
- New §0.2: what sub mode IS and when to use it — local mode (client runs an
agent on the user machine) vs sub mode (offload a multi-agent job to cloud
AM). Client in sub mode = initiator + work viewer + local artifact/deploy.
- §2: added the model-call channel that was entirely missing — both client and
AM call HM /v1/* for models (a parallel channel to the task control plane).
- §3.7: iteration now has two paths — (A) send back to cloud AM, or (B) git
pull and fix locally with the client own agent (reuses local capability).
- Scope + client TODO updated to reflect the client agentic role.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Correct a fundamental mislabel: the desktop client is an agentic coding
program (like Claude Code) that runs agents and executes commands locally —
not a dumb shell. HM is the model-call gateway (new-api /v1/*) that BOTH the
desktop client and agent_management call to use models; HM does not run agents
itself. AI = the model, served by HM to both the local client and the cloud
AM runtime. sub mode = offloading a multi-agent job to the cloud AM (vs the
client running locally), with AM agents calling HM /v1/* for models.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Address review feedback for three-team clarity:
- Terminology nailed: HM = Heicode Manager (Go gateway, NO AI, never executes,
never touches a VM); AM = agent_management (the "Agent Manager" runtime, the
one with AI that runs agents). Removed all ambiguous bare "Manager".
- Capability boundary table: who has AI / who executes commands / who connects
the VM. Spells out that HM cannot deploy or read VM logs — deploy is run by
the client (user-confirmed, short-lived creds from HM); code execution is AM.
- §3.0 explicit step-by-step execution flow (17 steps, each naming HM/AM/client).
- §6 full display_status definition: enum, judging algorithm, real-vs-fake
artifact rules, success criterion — so all three teams interpret it the same.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- git = user-bound own repo (github/gitea by URL); auth = fine-grained PAT
(universal, paste a token) with SSH deploy key fallback.
- deploy MUST be client-executed with mandatory user confirmation; Manager
only issues short-lived encrypted credentials + audits.
- git executed by agent_management with an injected short-lived PAT; Manager
records refs only; agents push to delivery/PR branch, not main.
- New section 9: additional details to settle before v1 (repo state, secret
hygiene, budget/cancel/crash handling, acceptance, concurrency, provider
limits, deploy confirm/rollback, work-view UX).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Authoritative flow/spec aligning desktop client <-> Heicode Manager <->
agent_management for the sub mode: encrypt/auth, dispatch, streamed agent
work view, git-per-agent + merge into one deliverable, review/redo, deploy
via Manager-held credentials, and the resource-binding spec (git/vm/db/blob
-> Key Vault). Marks each item 已实现/部分/待建/待决策 with recommendations,
and lists per-end TODOs. Open decisions in section 8 for sign-off.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Step-by-step walkthrough of a real client-simulated run (task dep_39e53ee4c692)
with actual request/response at each stage: create -> poll workflow -> artifacts
-> manifest -> files -> archive. Confirms agent_management delivers real code
files + nested folders (backend/main.py, backend/models.py) surfaced as a
project_folder. Includes a client self-check list.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Workflow now documents top-level mode (sub_agile|swarm) + sub_mode, phases[],
per-agent tokens/tools/elapsed_seconds/artifact_ids, and metrics/aggregates,
with a note that per-agent metrics + artifact source role await
agent_management runtime support.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- Add 2026-06-02 changelog summarizing P0/P1 closure at the top.
- New error codes: ARTIFACT_ARCHIVE_NOT_READY/_FAILED, FILE_PATH_REQUIRED,
with retryable column and the unified error envelope note.
- §9 auth bullet now reflects encrypted-body writes + no-body signed GET.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Address the desktop client team gap analysis on the unified /api/heicode/*
surface:
- P0-1 GET device auth: no-body V2 signed-GET path (fetch forbids GET body),
same Ed25519 canonical with empty-body hash; UserOrV2DeviceAuth +
OptionalV2DeviceAuth dispatch on signature headers. Unit test added.
- P0-2 approval inbox: GET .../tasks/{id}/approvals?status=pending.
- P0-3 project_folder: artifacts list normalizes the primary code deliverable
to display_artifact_type=project_folder + is_project + manifest/files/
archive/revisions subpaths.
- P0-4 archive contract: real application/zip + Content-Disposition +
Content-Length; ARTIFACT_ARCHIVE_NOT_READY (retryable) when no files yet.
- P1-1 file path: GET .../files?path=<url-encoded> (no segment ambiguity).
- P1-2/P1-3 revision: local edits stored as accepted baseline; /messages and
/execute consume the latest accepted revision (-> applied), return
active_project_revision.
- P1-4 doc: Swarm same-shape routes stated explicitly.
Doc updated to match. Build + middleware/controller tests pass.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Document how the desktop client should classify and display sub-mode artifacts, including summary-only outputs and markdown code documents.
Constraint: Keep interface paths stable; update display and validation rules only
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Not-tested: Documentation-only change; git diff --check passed
Record the 2026-05-31 production Manager smoke result for ordinary sub mode after the Agent Manager Runtime image update.
Constraint: Keep ordinary sub mode separate from swarm mode and document real production ids only
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: narrow
Not-tested: Documentation-only change; git diff --check passed
Add separate Runtime mode selection for ordinary sub and swarm flows, including Swarm-specific create payload shaping and Azure VM env wiring. Document the ordinary sub artifact callback gap, swarm runtime findings, PayPal billing boundaries, deployment migration requirements, and desktop/API progress.
Constraint: Keep ordinary sub and HeiCode-Swarm Runtime deployments separate
Confidence: high
Scope-risk: moderate
Tests: go test ./...
chenchenandClaude Opus 4.8