AM shipped its updated runtime + fixes; live re-test confirms deploy → running
→ direct /health & /message/send (task completed) → stop → delete all pass, and
HM's per-agent access_token is minted + returned (non-empty UUID). Two AM-side
gaps remain: (1) the running agent does NOT enforce X-Agent-Access-Token
(no-token request still 200, agent card auth_required=None) — token isolation
not actually active; (2) subdomain is http:// (token + api_key in cleartext).
Contract §0.1 and client doc status notes updated accordingly.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
- AM contract: fix stale lifecycle path defaults in the env-override table
(/agents/{agent_id}, /agents/{agent_id}/stop — matches code, not the old
/api/agent/... values); correct the self-check create line to POST /agents;
align the verify-endpoint example to the real production response shape
(user_id is a string, agent_id included, miss returns {valid:false}).
- Client API: §0 overview now states HM mints the per-agent access_token
(AM no longer "returns" it).
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per the chosen design, the agent authorizes callers by comparing the request
header X-Agent-Access-Token against its env AGENT_ACCESS_TOKEN (constant-time),
no HM round-trip. AM contract §3.1 now states ① as the agreed integration with
Python pseudo-code; the /agent-access/verify endpoint is demoted to an optional
fallback. Client API §6 spells out the client's job: send X-Agent-Access-Token
on every direct-connect request.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
HM now mints a random per-agent access token at deploy, injects it into the
agent env (AGENT_ACCESS_TOKEN + HEICODE_AGENT_ID) and returns it to the
deploying client (agent list access_token). Only the owning user receives it,
so only they can drive the agent — closing the gap where any valid sk- could
drive any agent and exfiltrate its mounted resources.
AM authorizes the caller either locally (compare to its env token) or via the
new public POST /api/heicode/agent-access/verify {agent_id, access_token} ->
{valid, user_id} (constant-time compare, no info leak on miss). AM may opt out.
Docs: AM contract §3.1 + client API §6 updated; access_token no longer empty.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Ran the full desktop-client flow against production (real account) and updated
the doc to the verified responses:
- capabilities model = gpt-5.4; modes still returned but ignored.
- agent object: access_token is "" (AM issues none — connect via A2A api_key),
subdomain is a host (dep-xxx.taijiagnet.com), status starts Pending; real
binding_ids; shown as "生产实测" examples.
- §4: clarified the template `model` field is a role-tier hint (opus), not the
runtime model (gpt-5.4 injected at deploy).
- §5: stop currently fails / delete returns runtime_cleanup:"failed" (AM stop
missing + delete bug); HM removes the local record regardless.
- §6: must wait for status=running / health 200 before connecting; noted the
agent currently stays Pending and the subdomain isn't reachable yet (AM side).
- top banner: per-endpoint production verification note.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
POST /api/devices/logout (UserOrV2DeviceAuth): a device-signed client revokes its
OWN bound token via the signed X-Heicode-Device-Id (cannot touch other devices);
a session/JWT caller may pass {device_id}. Idempotent. The existing DELETE
/api/devices/:id revoke is session-only, so device clients had no self-logout —
this closes that gap. Documented in the client API doc §1.1.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Adapt HM's template-agent integration to AM's actual CODING_A2A API (per their
doc), keeping it isolated in agent_template_runtime.go:
- start payload -> AM's POST /agents { name, template:"coding_a2a_agent",
framework:"A2A", config:{user_id,...}, env } with the template .md folded into
env.AGENT_INSTRUCTION_TEXT, template_key -> AGENT_ROLE_NAME, model gateway via
OPENAI_BASE_URL + MODEL_NAME (OPENAI_API_KEY left to the client per A2A request).
- response parse -> access_info.domain/external_ip -> subdomain, namespace/name
-> runtime_id; AM issues no access_token (client uses A2A api_key).
- env names aligned to AM: GIT_DEFAULT_BRANCH, POSTGRES_* (was PG_*),
AZURE_BLOB_ACCOUNT_NAME/CONTAINER/ACCOUNT_KEY (was BLOB_*); source keys aligned
to the resource-binding form (db_name/username/database_password/access_key).
Only AM-supported types (git/mysql/postgres/azure-blob); vm/redis/mongo/bucket
now rejected as unsupported until AM adds them.
- frontend: resources page splits DB into MySQL/PostgreSQL (correct provider),
drops vm; deploy page hides unsupported resource types.
- docs: AM contract + client doc updated to the real env names, payload, and the
A2A direct-connect (message/send · message/stream) + api_key auth.
- tests updated for the new env names + AM payload/response shape. All green.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
Review of the client doc against the real code found and fixed:
- §1 auth was not self-contained (deferred the canonical to the deprecated doc).
Inlined the full signing contract verified against middleware/device_signature.go:
the exact header set, the fixed-order canonical string (method/path/ts/nonce/
fingerprint/eph_pubkey/sha256(body)), ed25519(sha256(canonical)), the heicode-aead-v1
encrypted-body rules, and the X-Heicode-Auth-Error / X-Heicode-Server-Time failure
headers.
- §2 auth mismatch (accuracy bug): /api/user/self is UserAuth (session/JWT), NOT
device-signed — a device-only client cannot call it. Marked it optional and
clarified the two different auth schemes (/api/user/self* vs /api/heicode/*).
- §8: documented that failures return HTTP 200 with success:false (client MUST
read success), and that error.retryable is always false (decide retry by code).
- §10 inventory: corrected /api/user/self auth + added /self/models.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
The 普通 sub task-orchestration model was replaced by the template-agent model
and its backend deleted. Removed the now-obsolete docs describing it:
- heicode-desktop-sub-agile-api.md, heicode-desktop-subagile-e2e-demo.md
- heicode-desktop-unified-api.md, heicode-sub-mode-flow-spec.md
- 普通sub敏捷模式-AgentManager对接任务清单.md
- AgentManager普通sub{产物回调缺失问题,剩余补充要求,联调整改要求}.md
Fixed dangling references in the new docs (client-api / template-agent-model).
Swarm (蜂群) docs kept — different mode, out of scope.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
New authoritative client doc (heicode-desktop-client-api.md): the desktop client
lists its agents from HM, gets each agent's subdomain + access_token, and
connects to the agent directly over SSE; models for both client and agent go
through HM /v1/*. Grounded in the production-verified responses (19 Chinese
templates, agent list/deploy/status shapes, error codes). Marks the old
unified-api doc (sub task-orchestration) as superseded.
Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 <noreply@anthropic.com>
chenchenandClaude Opus 4.8